Well, buckle up, because this one’s not just another headline about Washington drama—it’s a slow‑burn political thriller with stakes so high you can practically hear the nervous shuffling behind closed doors.
On live television, Tulsi Gabbard—yes, the former Democrat congresswoman who’s been torching her old party’s playbook for months—just accused the Obama administration of orchestrating what she flat‑out called a “treasonous conspiracy.” And the best part? She says the receipts are coming out… and they’re only getting started.
According to Gabbard, this wasn’t just your garden‑variety partisan jab. She says Barack Obama himself pushed his top intel officials to manufacture an assessment in December 2016—after Trump had already won—designed to prop up a narrative of Russian interference. Let that sink in.
A sitting president, on his way out, allegedly steering the intelligence community like a weapon to kneecap the man the voters had just chosen. And if you’re thinking, “No way they’d try something that bold,” well, Gabbard’s team just dumped 100 documents suggesting exactly that.
Here’s where it gets even juicier. She’s calling it a years‑long coup, not just some sloppy bureaucratic misstep. She says the media was leaned on, spoon‑fed, and then unleashed like an army of amplifiers, blasting a story about Russia hacking its way to Trump’s victory—while, according to her, the original intelligence didn’t even support that claim. That little revelation alone should make a few prominent anchors sweat under those studio lights.
DON’T MISS THIS: The single most important moment of transparency in US Government history…
The Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard just declassified proof of treason by President Obama.
I have never in my life seen the Intelligence Community declassify proof of… pic.twitter.com/zOfsVTkQxw
— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) July 18, 2025
And yet—watch the reaction. Instead of serious rebuttals or even cautious denials, Democrats are waving it off with snarky one‑liners. Representative Jim Himes smirked online that if this ever went to court, the “howls of laughter” would echo across four time zones. Cute. But notice what’s missing: a single substantive refutation. Just mockery. Just deflection. Almost like they’d rather you change the channel than start asking uncomfortable questions.
But here’s the kicker that ought to keep certain people up at night. Gabbard isn’t dropping this and walking away. She says whistleblowers are already stepping forward. She’s referring the evidence to the DOJ and FBI. And while the usual D.C. chorus is counting on those agencies to bury the story, she’s hinting—calmly, deliberately—that indictments aren’t off the table.
🚨BREAKING — DNI Tulsi Gabbard has just declassified documents that show “overwhelming evidence” that then President Barack Obama personally requested, and intentionally “manufactured and politicized intelligence” to create the narrative that Russia was attempting to influence… pic.twitter.com/hWavaJ3IYc
— Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) July 18, 2025
If you think this is just going to vanish under the next news cycle, think again. Gabbard looked straight into the camera and said accountability is essential. And that’s not the tone of someone backing down. That’s the tone of someone with more cards to play—cards that might just make the history books, if she’s telling the truth.
So here we are: a former president accused of gaming the intelligence machine, a former Democrat calling it treason, and a pile of documents that, so far, no one on the left seems eager to explain. What’s buried in those next releases? Who knew what—and when? And the question no one in the establishment wants you asking… what happens if she actually proves it?
