New Data Shows Changes in American Prosperity

Date:

Share:

So here’s the part the consulting world doesn’t want you to hear: the guy who just blew the lid off one of the most depressing stats about American life didn’t come from some think tank, federal agency, or Ivy League economics department. Nope. Nathan Halberstadt — fresh out of Vanderbilt and headed straight into the gilded halls of Boston Consulting Group — took one look at what the “Big Three” were actually doing and said, essentially, I’m out.

And why wouldn’t he? His description of the job reads like a parody of modern corporate priorities: “bureaucratic optimization of opioid sales, mass migration, off-shoring, and DEI.” That’s not corporate strategy — that’s a checklist for dismantling the country from the inside out. And the cherry on top? Cooking up statistics to push the “right” narratives, no matter how fake, flimsy, or conveniently pro-globalist they might be.

So he quit. And instead of spending his twenties pushing policies that make hedge funds richer and families poorer, he started digging for numbers that actually mean something. What he found has gone viral — because it’s the kind of data Washington doesn’t want you talking about.

The chart is simple but devastating. It tracks the percentage of 30-year-olds who are both married and own a home. In the 1950s, over half of them checked both boxes. Today? Around 15%. That’s a collapse, not a decline. And here’s the kicker: that cliff dive really began in the 1990s — right around the same time we decided free trade with China was a great idea, immigration laws were for suckers, and every sitcom on TV seemed designed to convince you marriage was either outdated or a trap.

Now, sure, everyone’s known the vibes were bad. Fewer marriages, fewer young homeowners, more people floating through life with nothing tying them down. But the scale of the drop? That’s a gut punch. And it raises a question that should be screaming from every news anchor’s mouth: why did it take one rogue ex-consultant to put this together?

Because here’s the uncomfortable truth — this isn’t just about money. Yes, housing prices have exploded. Yes, wages have stagnated. Yes, inflation has been eating through paychecks like termites through balsa wood. But the marriage numbers have cratered even faster than homeownership rates. That’s culture, not just economics. And when half of thirty-year-olds don’t see a reason to get married, it’s no wonder they’re not interested in putting down roots.

Politicians? Barely touching the issue. The closest we’ve gotten is the odd-couple pairing of Elizabeth Warren and John Kennedy pushing the “Build Now Act” — a bill that basically bribes states into building more housing. Which, in theory, sounds fine… until you realize that “more housing” often just means more soulless rentals bought in bulk by corporate landlords, or “affordable housing” projects that end up as open-air drug markets.

Even if it works, it won’t fix the bigger problem: we’ve raised a generation of people without any urgency to build a life. No marriage, no kids, no property — no skin in the game. And a country where the rising generation has no stake in the future? That’s a country on borrowed time.

The 1950s numbers weren’t a fluke. They were the result of a culture that valued stability, family, and ownership — and an economy that made those goals realistic. If we can’t reverse this freefall, we’re not just talking about lifestyle changes. We’re talking about the unraveling of the very foundation that’s kept America from splintering apart.

And Nathan’s little chart? It’s the warning flare. The question is whether anyone in power will actually care before the line hits zero.

Subscribe to our magazine

━ more like this

Transition Team Choice Raises Eyebrows in NY

Well, congratulations, New York City — you’ve officially gone from “The City That Never Sleeps” to “The City That Can’t Be Bothered to Lock...

Trump Team Responds to Cabinet Rumor With Photo

Ah, yes — another sunny day in the media circus, and what do we have here? The usual suspects at MS NOW (formerly MSNBC,...

Mark Kelly Responds to Question on Illegal Orders

Well, well, well — the party that’s been shrieking about “protecting democracy” is once again tap-dancing along the line of sedition, only this time...

Nashville Remarks Draw Attention to Behn Campaign

Well, it looks like Tennessee’s 7th Congressional District has found itself in the middle of a very real political reality show—one that even the...

Hegseth Responds to Democratic Military Comments

War Secretary Pete Hegseth did not exactly mince words this week. And honestly, when members of Congress put out a video encouraging U.S. service...
spot_img

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here