Trump Admin to Ask Supreme Court to Back Firing of Government Watchdog

Date:

Share:

The Trump administration is expected to ask the U.S. Supreme Court to uphold the firing of a government ethics watchdog after a lower circuit court judge had reinstated him.

According to NBC News, Hampton Dellinger, leader of the Office of Special Counsel, a whistleblower protection agency, had filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration after he was fired.

A district judge had temporarily reinstated Dellinger, a Biden appointee, during ongoing legal proceedings. On Saturday, a D.C. Circuit panel denied the Trump administration’s request to overturn the judge’s order on procedural grounds.

However, Dellinger claims in his lawsuit that he was fired illegally.

“That email made no attempt to comply with the Special Counsel’s for-cause removal protection,” Dellinger’s lawsuit reportedly said. “It stated simply: ‘On behalf of President Donald J. Trump, I am writing to inform you that your position as Special Counsel of the US Office of Special Counsel is terminated, effective immediately.’”

The Department of Justice (DOJ) plans to escalate the case to the Supreme Court, requesting intervention to keep Dellinger off the job while litigation continues. A copy of the application, provided by a DOJ official, has not yet been docketed at the Supreme Court.

The application contends that lower court actions have hindered President Donald Trump‘s ability to manage the executive branch, stating that preventing him from exercising these powers causes significant harm to the Executive Branch and the separation of powers.

The application, signed by acting Solicitor General Sarah M. Harris, read, “The United States now seeks this Court’s intervention because these judicial rulings irreparably harm the Presidency by curtailing the President’s ability to manage the Executive Branch in the earliest days of his Administration.”

The DOJ had reportedly said the lower court filings were an attempt to “supplant” Trump‘s Constitutional powers.

“This Court should not allow the judiciary to govern by temporary restraining order and supplant the political accountability the Constitution ordains,” the application said.

The Trump administration’s widespread dismissals and efforts to reduce the federal government’s size have been praised by fiscal conservatives but condemned as illegal by Democrats, labor unions, and progressive organizations.

 

The content in this feed is part of a partnership with IJR.com. While we strive for accuracy, the information presented here may change or be updated. This content does not constitute professional advice or endorsement.

Subscribe to our magazine

━ more like this

Elon Musk Accuses Judge And Jury Of Bias

Elon Musk asked a Delaware judge on Wednesday to step aside from ongoing Tesla-related lawsuits, arguing she showed bias against him by interacting with...

Late Night Host Disparages DHS Secretary Mullin

If I were going to take a shot at newly confirmed DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin, it wouldn’t be about his résumé—it’d be about his...

Jurors Rule Against Facebook And YouTube

A Los Angeles jury has found Meta and YouTube liable in a closely watched case over the impact of their platforms on children, awarding...

Lewandowski Could Be Subpoenaed Over DHS Ad Campaign

Congressional Democrats are pushing the Republican-led House to subpoena Corey Lewandowski, a top adviser to former Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, over his alleged...

Parents Take Their Fight To Congress

Their daughter, Sarah, died at 21 after living with a heart condition known as long QT syndrome type 1. Managing it meant taking daily...
spot_img

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here